Results 1,216 to 1,230 of 1247
AFL Forum | This Is AFL | Other Games | Silent Auction Draft Game (AFL Version)
- 7th March 2012 08:24 PM #1216This Is AFL | AFL Forum
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Where Jack Lives
- Posts
- 3,537
- Team
- Manchester United
Array Rep Power:       16 Reputation:       1719 So I could have PM'd and just stated "what ever the leading bid is on player xxxx just add an extra $1 so I get him??
MANCHESTER UNITED 20/13 - THANKS SAF
- 7th March 2012 08:25 PM #1217redbearposter.gif
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- Adelaide
- Posts
- 13,751
- Team
- Adelaide Crows
- Other
- Baltimore Ravens
Array Rep Power:       78 Reputation:       12160 When I sent the PM I was under the impression we could go over & cut, because if I did go over it wasn't going to be by much anyway.
After that I state that if I reach my cap space stop giving me players.
Which meant I should've stopped getting players from Zaha down.
- 7th March 2012 08:25 PM #1218@CaptainUniverse
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Faroe Islands
- Posts
- 21,953
- Team
- Carlton, LFC, Heat
- Other
- Jimmy Patto & Patty Cummins
Array Rep Power:       75 Reputation:       7320 IMO, it should have been outlined at the start of the game, but I am not running the game or participating in it.
But in all the draft games, only extreme circumstances allow bids to be re-submitted (ie. the runner of the game makes a mistake and awards a player wrongfully to someone, but only realises once a new list of players has been released and bids have been entered for the new list).
- 7th March 2012 08:26 PM #1219
- 7th March 2012 08:27 PM #1220This Is AFL | AFL Forum
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Where Jack Lives
- Posts
- 3,537
- Team
- Manchester United
Array Rep Power:       16 Reputation:       1719 Rather than discreetly you mean
MANCHESTER UNITED 20/13 - THANKS SAF
- 7th March 2012 08:28 PM #1221redbearposter.gif
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- Adelaide
- Posts
- 13,751
- Team
- Adelaide Crows
- Other
- Baltimore Ravens
Array Rep Power:       78 Reputation:       12160 Yeah it was convoluted, but to be fair spud nailed most of it. I went through to double check I was under cap & when I worked out I wasn't I owned up. When I sent that message everything in it was considered fair game.
It was after that it was contested, I even said I don't care if people resubmit after.
- 7th March 2012 08:29 PM #1222
- 7th March 2012 08:32 PM #1223This Is AFL | AFL Forum
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Where Jack Lives
- Posts
- 3,537
- Team
- Manchester United
Array Rep Power:       16 Reputation:       1719 I am still shaking my head but TBH this is just a game and I dont really give a rats arse what the outcome is.
I just hope this opens eyes to what is required to run one of these games.
Rules are pretty simple and I would be happy to assist anyone on how these games could be run.
Believe me I am no expert but I would say I have run all draft games successfully thus far by sticking to a few simple rules.
Pretty certain JP and a few other of the Soccer guys would agreeMANCHESTER UNITED 20/13 - THANKS SAF
- 7th March 2012 08:34 PM #1224
- 7th March 2012 08:41 PM #1225redbearposter.gif
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- Adelaide
- Posts
- 13,751
- Team
- Adelaide Crows
- Other
- Baltimore Ravens
Array Rep Power:       78 Reputation:       12160 Look I admit that was a bit sketchy in hindsight but it was in no way cheating. As I said the precedent was set by others who did similar though out the back end of the draft.
Just don't call me a cheat, I created an advantage with the salary cap I had left. I was saving it for buddy at the back end of the draft for a game which was meant to consist of 30 rounds. It got cut short because we had 5 people with cash left and we had a massively stacked final round. I wanted to maximise the cash advantage I had built up. I'm not even the only one in this round that did it.
- 7th March 2012 08:48 PM #1226This Is AFL | AFL Forum
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Where Jack Lives
- Posts
- 3,537
- Team
- Manchester United
Array Rep Power:       16 Reputation:       1719 BS please don't think I am pissed at you, because that is far from the truth.
As far as creating an advantage with the salary cap you had left...well you went over it didn't you
MANCHESTER UNITED 20/13 - THANKS SAF
- 7th March 2012 08:53 PM #1227This Is AFL | AFL Forum
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- Perth
- Posts
- 4,353
- Team
- Geelong
- Other
- Liverpool, NZ Huskies, Warriors, Wildcats
Array Rep Power:       37 Reputation:       6868 Stop arguing bitches.
Trade period?
- 7th March 2012 08:54 PM #1228Master of Whispers
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 2,779
- Team
- Geelong
- Other
- Everton, Dortmund, NY Giants, Habs
Array Rep Power:       24 Reputation:       4332 The tactics were questionable, I argued against them, however this was settled prior to the round. Spud made his ruling and gave everyone a chance to rebid if they wanted. Dodgy yes, but it was allowed so that is the end of it really.
Valar Morghulis
- 7th March 2012 08:57 PM #1229This Is AFL | AFL Forum
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Where Jack Lives
- Posts
- 3,537
- Team
- Manchester United
Array Rep Power:       16 Reputation:       1719 Looking for a key forward, look over my list and give me a like for like...and don't try and pull a swifty on me as I was not born yesterday (fuck off with your pending retort about my age cunts!)
MANCHESTER UNITED 20/13 - THANKS SAF
- 7th March 2012 08:57 PM #1230This Is AFL | AFL Forum
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Where Jack Lives
- Posts
- 3,537
- Team
- Manchester United
Array Rep Power:       16 Reputation:       1719 PM it to me as I am off to bed
MANCHESTER UNITED 20/13 - THANKS SAF



318Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
